Home
Product Information
Questions/Answers
Research Online Support
Order Now
Contact Us
|
Effects of Premature Drill
William Brownell, 1930’s
- drill doesn’t promote memorization for all
- drill doesn’t change the way kids think
- drill doesn’t promote quantitative thinking
- drill does increase speed and accuracy
- drill is not enough; students need more
Goals For Learning Basic Facts
William Brownell, 1940’s
There are two major goals when you are teaching the basic facts:
- immediate responses
- justifying those answers by explaining why they have to be correct
Rate, Accuracy, and Process In Learning Multiplication
William Brownell, 1940’s
- 75% of kids who had a way to figure out the answer to a basic fact had memorized those facts by the end of the school year
- 60% of kids who were guessing or giving rote responses were still doing that at the end of the school year
- helping students learn thinking helps them memorize basic facts
Summer Retention Of Basic Facts
Ed Rathmell, 1970’s
- Kids who could justify the answers by a procedure other than counting dropped 8% over the summer
- Kids who could not justify their answers dropped 55% over the summer
- helping students learn thinking helps them retain facts
- helping students learn thinking helps them retain facts
Thinking Strategies for Subtraction
Carol Thornton and Paula Smith, 1980’s
At the end of the first grade:
- 60% of kids with drill approach were still counting
- 30% of kids with strategies approach were still counting
- helping students learn thinking helps them get beyond counting to answer facts
- 12% of kids with drill approach had facts memorized
- 55% of kids with strategies approach had facts memorized
- helping students learn thinking helps them memorize facts
- 20% of the responses were incorrect for the drill approach
- 2% of the responses were incorrect for the thinking strategies approac
- hhelping students learn thinking helps them become more accurate
Sample References
- “Action Research: Strategies for Learning Subtraction Facts,” by Thornton and Smith in The Arithmetic Teacher, April, 1988, pp. 8-12.
- This article includes convincing data for helping students learn thinking strategies.
- “Strategies for Basic-Facts Instruction,” by Isaacs and Carroll in Teaching Children Mathematics, May, 1999, pp. 508-515
- This article includes what we currently know about teaching basic facts and some of the current issue
Thinking With Numbers
Rathmell, Leutzinger, Gabriele, 1990’s
A thinking approach to teaching the basic facts was more effective than a worksheet and drill approach in the following ways:
- better speed and accuracy
- better mental computation
- far fewer students used their fingers
- helping students learn thinking helps students develop number sense
Low ability students made the greatest gains in
- speed
- accuracy
- mental computation
- ability to use thinking strategies
- far fewer used their fingers
- all students can learn thinking strategies
After summer vacation, randomly selected students from the experimental class and the control class were interviewed
experimental students
- not one used their fingers
- all used at least one derived fact strategy
- all solved all three mental computation problems
control students
- all used their fingers at least once
- less than half used a derived fact strategy
- less than half solved as many as one of three mental computation problem
Thinking With Numbers
After 1 Year In One School, Percent of Students Not Proficient At Mathematics, 2002-2003

Go to top
|